I
have always admired the work of stonemasons, particularly those who practice uncoursed rubble masonry[1], where intact
stones of various sizes are used to create a range of structures, from those
that go unseen (foundations), to those that protect those who don’t want to be
seen (compound walls), to those that denote the lodgings of those whose labour is
devalued when discussing economies where the capitalist mode of production is operative
(worker housing).
As
a teenager I was told that if I insisted on writing unspectacularly I would do
well to learn a trade -- so I read everything I could on masonry. When
reflecting on a life in writing, I sometimes wonder if I, like Hesse’s
Goldmund, might have been happier had I chosen to make my poems with, say, river
rock, sand and earth, and not ink, paper and letters (and now plastic and
electricity).
This
April the Okanagan Valley experienced a confluence of conditions that resulted
in rising water levels and flooding. Because I sometimes live here, and because
I believe in the power of the occasional poem, I thought I would propose a
collaborative project that linked my work as a (local) writer with those whose
work is, if not masonry in the way we have come to know it, based on similar principles
-- but with softer, homogenous and more expedient results: sandbagging.
What
would such a collaboration look like? What are its terms? How and where would
it begin? These are difficult questions to answer. Difficult because if I had answers,
I would be on my own with them -- a failed collaborator.
A
place to begin my inquiry could be with those who manufacture sandbags. Another
place could be with those who have assembled sandbags and placed them in areas
susceptible to flooding. A third place could be with those who distribute
sandbags at times of emergency -- namely, government (a branch of which is the
military).
As
far as production methods go, that too is to be determined, based in part on terms
offered up by my collaborators. With that said, in whatever discussions I enter
into I will introduce the relationship between the written poem and that which
is made with river rock, sand and earth, a form that has more in common with
something we walk on -- a pathway -- than a poem or a prose paragraph.
At
present, my proposal is a fantasy. Or if not a fantasy, it begins as such, perhaps
similarly to the way Roland Barthes began his 1977-78 Collège de France
lectures. In an essay prior to the posthumous publication of his lecture notes (The Neutral), Barthes writes of his
interest in a “phantasmic teaching” concerned with the “comings and goings of
desire,” and “that at the origins of teaching such as this we must always
locate a fantasy, which can vary from year to year.”[2]
This
year’s fantasy is a trauma fantasy -- brought on by flooding.
2.
Roland Barthes, “Lecture,” trans. Richard Howard, October, no. 8 (spring 1979):
5
No comments:
Post a Comment